![]() |
Key New Provisions of GASB Statement No. 34, Part Three Miscellaneous Topics December 27, 1999 (SmartPros) Former standards used the terms operating transfers and residual transfers. The latter mainly consisted of contributions to other funds (e.g., general fund to enterprise fund). These terms now are obsolete. Interfund activity should be classified and reported as follows:
Component Units
Component units should be presented discretely in both (1) the government-wide activity statement of net assets and (2) the statement of activities. Component units that are "fiduciary in nature" should be included only in the funds statements, not the government-wide statements. Major component units may be reported in a separate set of basic financial statements (consistent with GASB Statement No. 14). Reporting choices for component units:
Notes to the Financial Statements
GASB Statement No. 34 requires extensive disclosures with regard to accounting policies and reporting practices. Two notes of special importance are as follows:
Other required notes include the following:
Required Supplementary Information other than MD & A
One of the most interesting changes has to do with budget-to-actual comparisons. Budgeting includes both original and final budgeted amounts, actual amounts, and variance. The former model only reported the final budget. Now users can see how the initial budgeted amounts were changed. After all, budgeted amounts are the most significant values in a governmental unit. This reporting holds officials accountable for what was budgeted at the beginning of the year, a major step forward in governmental reporting. The new reporting requirements affects general funds and special revenue funds with legally adopted budgets. See Exhibit 12 for an example. Effective Dates Major governments: June 15, 2001 for governments with over $100 million in revenues.
Mid-sized governments: June 15, 2002 for governments with between $10 million and $100 million in revenues. Small governments: June 15, 2003 for governments with less than $10 million in revenues. Transition Governments may establish the historical cost of infrastructure assets by reference to current replacement costs and an appropriate price index. Example Suppose that in 2005 the replacement cost of a road constructed in 1991 was $10 million. A road construction price-level index was .90 for 1991 and 120 for 2005. The road would be recorded at an initial cost of $7.5 million ($10 million times 90/120). If the road had a useful life of 30 years, then at the end of 2005 (after 15 years, it would be 50 percent depreciated) it would have a book value of 50 percent of $7.5 million or $3.75 million. 1999, Smartpros Ltd. All Rights Reserved. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||