![]() |
Change Orders & Innovative Pricing Methods January 24, 2000 (SmartPros) In one of my previous articles entitled, Pricing Psychology, I discussed the logic of change orders and how firms can use them to overcome the three pricing emotions: price resistance (sticker shock), price anxiety (buyer's remorse) and payment resistance. Change orders allow you to establish a price for additional services when you possess the leverage, which is critical if you are to receive the maximum value for your work. Change orders allow the customer to have control over all marginal services and gain both their ego investment and commitment on the price and terms of the additional work to be performed. Auto mechanics and contractors have used change orders for decades, with very salutary effects for pricing and cross-selling services. In this article I provide a sample change order you can adapt to your firm's and customers' cultures, personalities and styles. Also, I will discuss a couple of innovative pricing methods that you can use in "value pricing" your change orders. Outside-In Pricing
One of the most innovative ways I have found to value price is simply to ask the customer what he or she thinks the service is worth. I refer to this as outside-in pricing. This pricing strategy stems from the theory that, ultimately, a service is worth only what someone will pay for it. Therefore, why not ask your customer directly what the service is worth? That sounds radical, but remember that radical is Latin for getting back to the root. I began using outside-in pricing on small projects and learned that my customers would quote a price two or three times higher than I would have charged them under hourly billing. That was an epiphany for me and made me realize just how much money professionals leave on the table by talking about hours and not value. As I gained confidence with these small jobs, I tried it with larger projects and discovered the same tendency: The customer would quote a price two or three times higher than I would have charged. This method has many advantages:
Finally, outside-in pricing allows you to build customer loyalty and goodwill. For instance, I had a customer quote a price of $3,000 for a certain project that he demanded on very short notice (over the weekend). At standard rates, the job would have been priced at $1,200. When he said $3,000, I told him what a valuable customer he was, how I wanted to help him with this particular project, and said I would do it for $2,500. He was happy. I was happy. No amount of marketing or advertising can build that type of loyalty and goodwill.
Please note that I do not advocate that you always capture 100 percent of the value; I believe you must let the customer retain a portion of it in order to invest in the relationship. That is what Total Quality Service, customer loyalty and developing partnerships with your customers are all about. But that still leaves a substantial amount of value you can tap into and you should at least get a portion of it when you can identify its existence. Retrospective Price
"Sample Retrospective Price Clause (Non-Attest Customer).In the event that we are able to satisfy your needs in a timely and professional manner, you have agreed to review the situation and decide whether, in the sole discretion of XYZ, some additional payment to ABC is appropriate in view of the overall value of the service(s) rendered (and the financial results, if allowed by your state and professional society) achieved by XYZ during 1998." For CPAs, this will only apply for a non-audit customer. Also, your particular state may not allow contingency fees. If so, simply remove the "financial results" portion and base the price on the customer's satisfaction alone. By predicating the price on the customer's level of satisfaction with your service, you are not charging a contingency. I frequently hear stories from CPAs about situations in which if they had used a clause similar to this, they would have received a higher price then they charged using the hourly method. One such story comes from a partner in a recent training program. This CPA assisted his customer in selling his business and was able to make a $15 million difference in the sales price and increase that directly accrued to his customer. When I asked him how much he billed for his services, he replied $38,000. When I asked him what he thought the customer would have paid had he used a change order with a retrospective price clause, he said - to his chagrin - $500,000. In other words, he left $462,000 on the table!
As he recounted this story to me, I felt vindicated in my view that hourly billing is a terrible way for a professional to price his or her services. And it is precisely opportunities such as this that we let slip by, at the margin, at an enormous loss in profits. Borrowing an illustration I have heard form many CPAs around the country, I informed this CPA that he made the ultimate accounting entry:
Now, I realize this story is the exception, and not the rule, in terms of the opportunities that arise daily in your practice. However, that does not mean opportunities such as these never present themselves. They do - and by using the change order, you should become more cognizant of them. The retrospective price clause is obviously going to be used only with a customer with whom you have developed a high level of trust and respect. But this is precisely the customer who will value your services the most. Had this partner issued a change order with a minimum price to cover his efforts and left it up to the customer to decide what the value of the service (or result) was worth, he would have been much better off, and the customer would have been just as happy with the service and value provided. Good customers are not out to take advantage of professionals, especially when you help them achieve a major goal. This example also illustrates how it is possible for firms that are skilled at value pricing not to maintain time records. How many hours is $462,000 worth at standard rates? However, do not confuse cause and effect: These firms are not profitable because they do not use time sheets; they do not use time sheets because they are so profitable. It only takes one or two opportunities such as these each year to add enormously to your bottom line. I have heard far too many stories such as these from CPAs around the country; they are simply too painful to recount. I would bet that you have examples from your own practice of similar occurrences.
Why have we left so much money on the table? Because we are trapped in the paradigm of the almighty hour. It is riskier to put the pricing decision in the hands of the customer, but look at the rewards. It is no accident that the work risk in the original Arabic means, "earning one's daily bread." Risk is where all profits - and especially, super normal profits - come from. I think the risk is worth it. Do you? Why Not Start Now? You should begin using change orders as a standard policy in your firm anytime the scope of an engagement changes. Be sure your entire staff is aware of the policy, as the staff is usually the first to discover a scope change. Make sure you always get the customer's input and involvement in drafting the change order, form the responsibilities assumed by each party, to the price and terms of payment. This ego investment will reduce buyer's remorse and payment resistance when it is time to collect the check. Sample Change Order Customer:____________________ Date:________________________ Project Description (and estimated completion date, customer responsibilities, if appropriate, and any other level of detail needed): ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ Price: $_____________________ Terms:______________________ We believe it is our responsibility to exceed your expectations. This Change Order is being prepared because the above project was not anticipated in our original Fixed Price Agreement, dated xx/xx/xx. Customer XYZ, and ABC, CPAs have mutually agreed upon the price for the above project. It is our goal to ensure that XYZ is never surprised by the price for an ABC service; therefore, we have adopted the Change Order Policy. The price above is due and payable upon completion of the project described (or payable up front, or in installments, etc. - whatever you and the customer agree to). If you agree with the above project description, price, and terms, please authorize and date the Change Order below. A copy is enclosed for your records. Thank you for letting us serve you. Sincerely, Agreed to and accepted: Author's Note: The preceding change order does not replace your firm's standard engagement letter. You still must use engagement letters for each major service you provide, in accordance with your professional liability carrier's guidelines. The only modification you need to make to your standard engagement letter is where it discusses price. In that section, I simply refer to the change order, dated xx/xx/xx. The engagement letter is where you maintain all of the legal language (such as mediation and arbitration, costs in the event of a lawsuit, interest charged on past due amounts, the right to stop work for nonpayment of services, etc.). Nothing in your firm's present engagement letter should change, with the exception of the price clause, as a result of using a change order. 1999, Harcourt Brace Professional Publishing. All Rights Reserved. Reprinted with permission. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||