Choose an area of interest:
Search 

Choose an area of interest:


Alphabet Soup: Making Sense of the Standard Setting Process
Brought to you by FMN Online

April 2002 (SmartPros) With the Enron mess causing an uproar, accounting standard setters are bombarded with recommendations on how to improve the process so it is as efficient and accurate as possible. But given the complexity of standard setting, who holds what keys to ensure necessary changes are made?



For an understanding of who does what, here is a brief overview of each standard setting body, as outlined in FMN Online's CPE course, FASB and AcSEC: Standard Setters Speak.
FASB   Since 1973, the Financial Accounting Standards Board has been the designated private-sector organization for establishing standards of financial accounting. As the primary standard setter in the area of financial reporting, the FASB sets Level A GAAP standards that govern the preparation of financial reports. The seven members of the Board are appointed to a full-time, five-year term, and are required to sever all connections with the firms or institutions they served prior to joining the Board. The FASB's standards are officially recognized as authoritative by the SEC's Financial Reporting Release Number 1 and the AICPA's Rule 203.
 
AcSEC   The Accounting Standards Executive Committee is the senior technical committee authorized to speak on behalf of the American Institute of CPAs when it comes to accounting matters. AcSEC sets Level B GAAP standards. The 15-member group works with the FASB, SEC, and International Accounting Standards Board. The accounting standards that AcSEC issues are prepared largely through the work of task forces composed of CPA volunteers, each having an AICPA staff member as liaison.
 
SEC   Established by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to restore investor confidence in the securities markets, the Securities and Exchange Commission is responsible for setting standards for all public companies in the U.S. The SEC has five Commissioners who are appointed by the President of the United States. Historically, the SEC's policy has been to rely on the private sector for the standard setting function so long as FASB fulfills its responsibility.
 
EITF   The Emerging Issues Task Force, an independent group formed by the FASB in 1984, is designed to include persons in a position to be aware of emerging issues before they become widespread and before divergent practices regarding them become entrenched. EITF members are drawn primarily from public accounting firms but also include representatives of large companies. If the group can reach a consensus on an issue, usually that consensus is taken by the FASB as an indication that no Board action is needed. A consensus is defined as an agreement, provided that no more than two of the thirteen voting members object. Consensus positions of the EITF are considered part of GAAP. If consensus is not possible, it may be an indication that action by the FASB is necessary.
Hence, given the complexity of the standard setting process, even though the rules governing accounting are seemingly fixed, they may be interpreted differently by various "players" in the process simply because there are many authorities to reference.
 
SmartPros' FMN Online recently spoke to John Wulff, the newest appointee of the FASB. According to Wulff, one of the FASB's top agenda items is to consolidate standard setting by the FASB, EITF, AICPA and the SEC into a unified database, which would "improve retrievability and begin to address some of the standards overload issues."
 
Wulff said this relatively new agenda item is in the early stages of development. The FASB decided in January to begin to work with the AICPA and SEC to try to develop an integrated database.

"I have every reason to believe they will be very cooperative in these efforts, but we do need to work with them," Wulff stated.
 
In contrast, Wulff addressed topics of the FASB agenda that may not be in alignment with fellow standard setting groups. For instance, the EITF's scope on revenue recognition may be different than the FASB's, forcing the FASB to either build off EITF's work or to steer a new course.
 
Wulff emphasized that no matter what the role of each standard setting body, the important thing is that preparers continue to participate in the standard setting process.
 
"On occasion, it may seem as though the Board isn't listening, but I can assure everyone that the Board does listen and, in fact, it's a very, very valuable part of the process," Wulff said. "So keep sending those letters, comments and criticisms in."
 
More on the FASB's agenda from Wulff, as well as thoughts from AcSEC Chair Mark Sever, can be viewed in the CPE course FASB and AcSEC: Standard Setters Speak (1 credit, $44.99, or available with a FMN Online subscription).
 
For more information on SmartPros CPE programs, visit SmartPros Knowledge.

2002 SmartPros. All rights reserved.

Related Stories
 
 
The Audit: Turning Enron Into a Positive

Global Accounting Standards Update

  Also By This Author
 
Efficient Supply Chain Management

Tax Shelter Disclosure: To Tell or Not to Tell?

Executive Transitions and the Honeymoon Myth

An Update on Management Buyouts

  Related Courses
 
FMN Video

FMN Online


 
Would you recommend this article?
5 (yes, highly)
4
3
2
1 (no, not at all)
Comments:


 
 
About SmartPros | Accounting Products | Professional Education | Marketing Services | Consulting | Engineering Products | Contact Us
2009 SmartPros Ltd.